This site is in association with Grand European Greek Villas

why not rent a Greek Villa

This site is a fabrication, only the stats are true. it s a story to educate
people

hello my name is Jimmy Macsppooonfle from Greece

And I am a time traveling
19thCentury revolutionary.

I have invented a time nachine, and am traveling around in the 19thC and 20thC trying to depose dastardly monarchies, and their simply terrifying lowest of the low grip on power.

How monarchs claim they represent
all that is good in their established religons, then ally with dictators crushing
that religon, how they do some many bad things Anyhow,

here is my top 10 of most evil monarchial acts of the 19thC

1. The insidous Chinese emperor in the 1900s, I tell you they made me sick, whipping and beating their servants They saw something close too 100
million people die under famine slavery and poverty and war under them in the
19thC. so the time traveler helped organise the KMT to oust this regime,

2 The dastardly British monarchy They were a killing and executing
loads of people acreoss their reign, they satarised oponents of them in the
1650s, as dullards, who just did not like their fun ways, You know fun to sick
royalist minds, as in cavaliers raping womenfolk, and massacring the men, and
of course they hated teh dullards, as they were writing poem,s far too boring
for the cavliers who spent tax on their mansions, tajing it off child labourers,
and fanmine victims, and spending it on their fine alcoholic beverages. Well its
been tough ousting these diehards, but these sickos, are losing allot of popularity.
Anyhow, they lost allot of power in teh 19thC, and 20thC, and are now powerless
figureheads. But they did help attack teh French Revolution, and helped impose
teh British empire in India, total deaths toll see my 19thC deaths tolls stat.
Our agents helped depose them in teh 19thC using chartiosts, and liberals.

3 The Belgian Royals 15Million Deaths their dastardly monarchy still has some respect
in Belgium. a terribkle thing when you read what it did in Congo. A shame upon
Belgium.

4 The Russian Empire 10Million Deaths The Russian monarchy kept
serfdom so long, But happily our agents deposed these people lateer.

5 The Portugueese/Brazilian Royals 3.5Million deaths. There constant slaving, and
their killing of so many Paraguayans, made it neccessary to oust these tyrants,
sadly some people still want them back, Forgetting the millions they did not care
for.

6 The Japanese Empire 3million deaths. Loads of famines, our agents
saw the shogun ousted by the emperor, we tried to impose a republic, but failed.

7 The Ottoman Empire 3Million deaths. The constant massaacres of Armenians,
and opthers, angered many of our agents. It took allot iof time to depose this
regimes.

8. The Spanish kingdom 3Million deaths. Less than years before,
massively as agents had helped in teh ousting of theri empire, but the empire
still saw oppressions continue for long.

9 The Persian Royals 3million deaths
Why if Persia's religous dictatorship is deposed, it should be replaced bya democratic
republic. This bubnch of lunatics, igbnired famines, they were on teh crest of
falling.

10 Italian royals 3Million their empire in Africa killed many,
some say more than 3 million, These scheming fascist alllies, wanted power, and
were power, mad, Well agents were killed aropunf teh world, in attempts
to depose these crazed ma d men, i.e behaded in japan, executed in italy, shot
in strikes, in Belgium, which helped depose the king. We have built a memorial
thjing on teh dark side ogf teh Moon.

1. World War one, this huge
mega conflict cost millosn of lives, it can be blamed on Germany, ASustraia, anmd
Russia's monarchies. The Austrian monarchy did not mind causing a massive imperial
war purely as one of it's royal relatives had been shot while occupying Sareavo,
for purely imperialist reasons. the Russian royalty made the descison,
to mobilise which started world war one,The German army was most repsonsible.
it's kaiser invading, over 70million people died in this warOur
agents were dyingh all aroundf teh place but were able to use this with socialist
parties to depose teh German and Russian Royals, The AUSTRIAN royals very easy
to oust. and many others.

2 The Japanese monarchy Our agents could not belive
the reports of the horrendous kills by the Japnese monarchial lover army. Massacres,
and kills the ordinary man would enver belive. 27 million deaths

3. Imperial China 28million deaths by the 1900s famines, and slavery, Well we have
talked of that earlier

4 Russian royal depravities. We have already
mentioned the causing of Wrodl war one. Also killing Jews, in World war one, the
Iranian famines, they caused, German soldiers dying in Royal Gulags. etc,. etc,
well they were deposed. 7 million deaths,.

5 The demon Belgian
king 15million deaths, the Beglian empire, happily our agents helped depose them
in Congo

6 British Empire and Indian princes famines, and poverty, deposed
by our agents in teh 1940s many milliosn of death

7 Nazis, allainces, mabny
kinsg allied with the Nazis to a terrible of extent see 21st C monarchies

8 tHE oTTOMANS, their masasacres in world war one, were terrible, and before

9 The Arabian dictatorship, that evil monarchy still alive, today, executing all
liberals agents whipping them, all in teh name of their satanic lust for power.
Their love of gfar right conservative movements huge. They helpe cause terrorism,

See

The%20evil%20of%2021st%20century%20monarchies.htm

10 The Italian monarchy, its appointments of facsists, its lust for empire, it needed
ousting happily our partisans acheived that in 1945. very clever use of electioneering.

>An Index for our sites, with links to 100s of our greatest sites.

In terms of death the most murderous regimes are fascist and monarchial. As you would expect seeing that the crime of Communism, was that they were dictatorships, but the crime of monarchy as that they inately can not treat all people as equals, unless they are not really monarchies like Britain, and just have a monach as head of state, like a pointless totem, who wastes money,

So there you have it all monarchy is a sin, and a murderous ideal, that cares about a millionaire hurting it's toe, but not entire towns and villages. It kills, it causes calamities, across world history. American history, and European history, and 3rd world history, From it's luxury too cheap poverty.

We should have republics, not putting the lowest price on humanity, but the best value.

The top 2 of this list both supported the German monarchy and cried when it quit in 1918, when ousted by a socialist revolution. This along with the 1917 Russian Revolution ended World War one.

So the proof that Republics, and things like that are best.

In terms of deaths of course no regime, matches the Nazi regieme. In terms of what I like to call Nazi, which is any racist far right regime, on this list alone would be all but the Communist deaths, and some British Empire deaths. So the Nazis, or fascists, Nazis, colonialists and monarchists, have killed many times what Communism killed.

Some may say I should not include World war Two, or World War one, or the Flu, or famines. I think this is mad, surely all deaths from World War One, and the Flu, of 1918, were caused by the Kaiser's desire to reduce the world to a German colony by war. Some lists like this claim we should not include World War two, battle and famine deaths. Such as the famous innacuracy "Stalin killed more than Hitler", a statement weiled out normally by right wingers, trying to defend racism, or pretend the NHS is as evil a concept as of it being stated ran, as racism. In actual fact the claim about Stalin is a lie, yes he killed many, but actually there are many stats which include lower birth rates in Ukraine as deaths, and claim more people died in the Gulags, than the amount of people other just as right wing people, claim were in them in total. There are also claims which really were just to help the 1980s fight versus communism, which are actually innacurate, useful, but wrong. The same people who claim there is notghing wrong with monarchy, the type who say "it does not matter if we have the same constitutional system as that inj the end of lord of the flies is ruling us, or some elected leader", are the same people, who then exagerate the stats for Communism, willfuly so they can claim any state tax, or welfare is wrong. There are some people, who claim that individual Communist regimes killed more than the Nazs, by only including the Holocaust deaths by the Nazis, (12million). They then include all the deaths as of Communism from teh famine, to Gulags, to anything. This is insane, thats like saying Margaret Thatcher killed more people than Hitler, you know just minus out the Holocaust (as well as world war two), and she killed more via the Falklands war. Surely if you include the famine in Ukraine, and Gulags, then you should include the World War two famines, caused by the invasions of the USSR. And surely the intent to kill in the Soviet famines was not always there, as can be shown by how the population of Ukraine increased most years of peace, before and after the famine in the Soviet era. Surely the policy of the Nazis, in their European famines, was partly to kill races they felt were inferior, and partly as they did not care, infact if we exclude any famine deaths it should be the Stalin era deaths as they were far more as of ignorance, and incompetance, than as of genocidal intent. There is no doubt the USSR had on some occasions intentions to wipe out Ukrainian populations, but these people were often sent to Gulags, and that was evil. But the fact is most Ukrainian famine deaths were as of incompetence. The fact also is that most European famine deaths in Worl war two were as of a evil intention, that if it had succeeded in it's conquest would probabaly have killed at least a few times as many people as who died in World war two. So as I say, my gripe is this, if we include the Ukranian famine as a stat to include, we should also include the European famines underthe Nazis. In this case you get something like 12-20million people. Then I feel also the war stats should be blamed on the Nazis, as without them teh war would not have occurred, indeed the party was constantly saying in the 1930s it wanted war, it felt war was natural as everybody else even most monarchial, and all the Communist dictatorships, were puzzling why anybody would want war. Surely the fact is the Nazis knew what war would bring and planned more deaths than actually occurred, so they can be blamed for all the deaths in World War Two, So from this my stat is there, and we know what is what, people who say "Stalin killed more than Hitler" are relying on stats that are lies. If you include loweered birth rates as a death, then World War Two, killed somewhere approaching 50-80million people, but a lower birth rate is not a death, it is certainly not an abortion or a death, as the births were not happening. If it is, then all the above stats go up again, and some overtake the Communist regimes. If you include lower birth rates as deaths, then monks are comitting genocide, as are everybody who is not reprouding triplets every 9 months. Yes I respect the Rummel, style calculations, but they are mabye a bit biased to the right, but even then they do accept right left and centre all did bad stuff. Added to this they are very much in favour of democracy, so they must be respected as very useful sources. The worst are lunatic right winger who solely claim lefties did, and insanely never admit that monarchies were just a bit better than Nazis, and miles worse than the Communists.

And in the same way, you can blame Germany, then Russia, and Austria-Hungary for World War One, as they made the actions that caused it. And were extremely uncompromising in their attitude, unlike France, Britain, the USA, and the Ottomans, the other major involved states who were very much prepared for peace, and wanting peace.

Lots of Nazis moan about the "Holocaust industry" whenever a history book or movie is about that subject. They never call it the "Gulag industry" when a book is about communism, or the giollotene insudtry when it is about some of their royal evil kings being executed.

So there is no doubt what so ever, that monarchy is a killer, and that corrupt lunatics will ally to it, and not care about creating more terrorists (like in todays most powerful real monarchy in Arabia, where the world's biggest terrorism is from), and world war one, and also world war two.

Also here is my other statement which shows that the 1930s Soviet leader was better than the 1930s German ruler. The biggest fact of the lot is that they had different intentions. The Soviet Communists intentiosn were good, they wanted a better society. There is no doubt what so ever, taht no matter how bad Communism, was and corrupt it was allways, and brutal, the aim was abetter society for all. The far right intentiosn were evil, they made no bones in claimig "war is natura;" that the weak and vulnerable and weaker deserved to be wiped out. There is no doubt what so ever that one of those aims is evil and the other is not. There is no doubt some will claim the Nazis had good aims, that they were not just about what I stated, but there is no doubt what so ever, that that was a main belief a main means and a main ends, that they WANTED unfairness, that they WANTED unhappiness, there is no doubt the Communists aim was NOT unhappiness, for millions. That is why the end product was the Nazis killing more, and why we should see them as innately the most evil regime of the century, and fear people who want us to belive that Communists were more evil than Nazis. They have a scary bully and torture loviong belief. The NAZIS are the anti-Bible, the story of what your kids should not belive. The Communists were a regimes that sucessfully under Lenin, ousted a more murderous Tsarist regime, and were then followed by a brutal regime, that defeated a invasion that wanted to reduce the Russian and other Soviet people's to being slaves that apparently would be so much slaves, that they according to the Nazi leader should be afraid to talk to even the weakest German, for fear of reprisals. And who according to maps, wanted to kill most of the Soviet poipulation long term, and push the rest East of the Urals. There is NO DOUBT in the real world whose intentions were more evil. And there is no doubt which regime killed most, and in a far shorter era.

Also we can say we can thank the Communist regime of the 1920s for ousting a Tsar that caused millions of deaths, and thank the 1940s Societ regime, for defeating a regime that wanted to detroy the world for millions of people, as it was just evil. So in effect the net effect of the Communists for the USSR was good. Long term it will be good they were ousted, as they opposed freedom, and so equality, but that will take time.

And right wingers always talk about "the Ukrainian famine" but they only do so that we do not care about the victims of the Holocaust. Programmes about the Holocaust always show empathy with the sufferers, yes they rightly show some bits which make viewrs want the Nazis dead. But programmes about Gulags, are normally by left wingers trying to tell other left wingers not to become Communists, or are right wingers, saying "see the nazis were not that special, lots of people killed people", most right wing critics of Communism, focus on poor old king stupid face being deposed from being waited on hand and foot, and having to move house, they never show empathy, or if they do there is something fake about it, like White farmers in Zimbabwe, pretending it's the black farmers, who under them lived in huts, they care for in Zimbabwe, not the fact they have lost huge mansions. I may be being a bit unfair there, but loads of journalists have recently been writing books, and putting in articles sattements which can be coded as being just "stalin was worse than Hitler", something that is not true. You may say people have a right to say this, but loads of times they say this just as the Nazis are being critisised, Yehh I agree, fishy. e ye ye

They, the right wing never did anything for the victims of the Ukrainian famine in the 1930s, indeed in the US the Republican party campaigned against immigration of Eastern Europeans in the 1920s, as part of their election campaign.They cared when monarchs were executed, or when right wing regimes, and capitalism, was replaced, but did not when Ukranians died of famine. Anyhow more importantly more Ukranians died under the Nazi invasion than in the Ukranian famine, so they can talk all they like about Ukrainains inm ways that are really just to stop us caring about the Holocaust, but they killed more than the left did. That is why when Ukrainians are asked which was better the Nazis, or Communists, most say Communism, but are happy the Communists were ousted.

So the left win the body count we killed less than the right.

Yes so thats it, and what is greatest of all, no democracies appear on the list. All the above lists opposed democratic liberal society. So that is that democracy and freedom are best with socialism.

I know it may seem pointless to defend Communism, against Nazi--ism, and then to say it killed millions of people, so disproving the idea that the regimes, were good. But I am not trying to support Communist dictatorships, all I am saying is the fact that they were better than the Nazis, and the Monarchists. This matters, as if people do not realise that, then right wingers will claim otherwise and will make it seem the Communists were not worse than Clive of India, or the King who supported him, or French kings, or kings whose main aim, was glory and the preservation of a unequal evil version of order. It matters, it matters allot, as does the body count, as every life matters, even if you are not good at maths, and can not compute what all this means. The truth is brilliant, and fantastic, that untopianism, equality, fraternity and liberliams, did achieve something, that trying to be nice did makes a better world. So that is a great fact for all decent people. Monarchy is statisticly and idealogically more murderous than any left wing ideology.

There is no doubt the ideal of Communism, is better than the ideal of monarchy and the ideal of fascism, That is why Facism, and monarchy each a side of the same anti-equality coin, has killed more than all the left wing regimes, in the world ever put together in the 20th C alone.

Facsist regimes include the Nazis, and 1920s-30s KMT, and the British Empire on this list alone.

Yes monarchy has killed more if you add this list together than Facism, but other fascist regimes of the century, included 1930s Italy which caused a million deaths, and 1960s Indonesia, which killed a million, and this sort of drip drip effect means that monarchy finishes just level with fascist in 100s of millions killed. You could say of course that all fascist regimes were monarchial as they had a similar theroy on why they should rule, and that all monachial states were fascist as they also agreed with similar things. I know these facts will shock people who have grown up being taught the lie that stalin killed more than Hitler, I don't know why anybody wnated to belive that, its insane, or that monarchy has never hurt a fly, thats another insane belief.

Here are some more sites, there are books and articles on the subjects in many internet places, or internet book shops, bookstores, at the bottom, are lists of which were the worst regimes of the past few centuries.

>An Index with links to almost all our sites.

What were the worst regimes of the 20th Century

A site on the El Nino Famines that killed 10s of millions of Indians, and Chinese and others in the 19th Century

The Highland Clearances and it's full terribleness

A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese

The most evil regimes of the 19th century

A History of Ezo, the republic founded in Northern Japan in a revolt in the 19th Century

A site on 1640s Britain

Worst 18th Century regimes

Historical House Design stuff

Why the French Revolution was good

A Picture of Mont St Michel